• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • New to kink?
    • Articles for beginners
  • Contribute
  • BDSM Buying Guide

Kink Weekly

BDSM articles ideas bondage erotica resource

Home » The Barbie Analogy From Submissives

The Barbie Analogy From Submissives

February 7, 2021 By Ms. Rika 3 Comments

big little cute woman with pigtails and teddy bear
via stock.adobe.com

I hope you have been enjoying Rika’s Lair, my monthly column dedicated to thoughts and experiences  regarding power dynamics in Service-Oriented D/s relationships. Look up “Ms. Rika” in the search box  for links to all of my articles in KinkWeekly!  

This morning, I was participating in a discussion regarding the observations by some dominant women  that submissives do not show attraction well. The reasons for why this was the case isn’t as important as that the dominants in the discussion were lamenting about how they enjoy being the target of attraction  and how they feel limited to the submissive’s submissive acts as the means for recognizing that  attraction. They felt pressure to accept acts of submission as the only indicator of desire. There were  many comments that started with, “I’m not insecure, but…”. In general, when you start a sentence with  “I’m not xxxx, but…” – it means you know you ARE xxxx, and you don’t want to be. I know some of these  people well …These really aren’t insecure people, but they are PEOPLE – and people have insecurities. 

One dominant said, “This is a real struggle for me. I understand that I am the Dom and it is down to me  to make all the moves and be the lead. Which is obviously something I enjoy. But then the human in me  wants to feel wanted. Needed. I need to feel attractive for some reason other than my whip.” 

There’s a poison at work here; a recurring theme that drags us down. There is an insidious belief that  dominance can only be defined by a consistent standard to which we all aspire: Dominants are “All  powerful” … “Impenetrable” … “Demanding” … “Untouchable”. 

I began to think of my Barbie doll.  

We are fed this imagery of dominance from the very beginning. It is either something that we read, or  something that our partners told us: “Dominants are like Gods”. They are “Worthy of worship”. “They  have an impenetrable shield of confidence”. Bullshit. Newsflash: We’re not Gods; we’re mere mortals. 

This imagery is designed by submissives to serve the submissive mind. They want to feel subjugated to a  more powerful authority. They want to feel irresistibly compelled to submit. They want to be helpless – and to have that helplessness leveraged by an uncaring, unyielding, task master. The imagery is very  clear – and it spells out a standard you must support to be “A Dominant”. 

I repeat, it’s poison. The analogy to Barbie is strong: Barbie represents an image of female perfection  that can never be achieved – and yet, was held as a standard to which all women should strive. The  pressure to achieve the unachievable is established in the very core of the image. Worse, it’s an image  that mothers passed to their daughters. It’s a destructive process. 

For dominants, we’re facing a similar dilemma; male and female dominants alike; to appear and act like an archetype…to present the complement personality to what the submissive wants to see themselves  as. The submissive is defining what dominance looks like – in order to provide a framework that supports the imagery of themselves that they prefer. The result is a lot of pressure on the dominant – the one  supposedly being served. Worse, like mothers passing Barbie to their daughters, dominants often pass  that requirement to new dominants just entering dynamics. They transmit that which they themselves  were unable to attain; perhaps in an effort to avoid admitting their own inability to do so.

I won’t buy in to that imagery. I choose to define dominance by my own terms. I’m a dominant…which  means, I’m a person who has allowed people who want to serve me, to serve me. I didn’t force them to  serve me, I don’t expect them to fall to their knees because I’m some irresistible deity…I’m just a  person; with needs, desires, and yes, insecurities. 

This notion that a dominant must lead and make all the decisions: I don’t agree. Rather, the dominant is  the partner whose preferences set the direction of a power dynamic – whatever those preferences are.  We don’t have to make all the decisions – UNLESS it serves us to do so. We don’t have to lead, unless we want to. Our sub’s job is to serve us in whatever way we want to be served. Believing that it all falls on you is a tremendous amount of pressure to put on yourself – unless you enjoy being in that situation all  the time. Most of us enjoy leading most of the time – but there are times when we just want to follow,  or be held, or be vulnerable…and that doesn’t make us any less dominant.

What makes us dominant is that, when we feel like following – and having someone else “make the moves”, or be hugged, or  understood…they do it dutifully, with our best interests in their minds, motivated by their desire to do things FOR us, as our submissives. 

My advice: Don’t get hung up with that “dominant=perfection” stigma…it’s analogous to the pressure of  the perfect figure, the perfect skin, the perfect hair…Remember: Barbie is a killer. Don’t let those  pressures force you to be someone you’re not. Be yourself, teach your submissive who you are and what  you prefer, and let your submissive serve the unique YOU that you are. 


Ms. Rika is a lifestyle dominant, educator, and author; living in the suburbs of NYC with her  husband/slave. She has written several popular books on her approach to adding Dominant-Centric,  Service-Oriented D/s to relationships. You can find her books (in both print and eBook formats) at  Lulu.com (http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/msrika), or at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, the iStore, Books-A Million, Kobo.com, or anywhere books are sold. Search for “Ms. Rika”.

You may also be interested in:

  • Erotica: Barbie Girl
    Erotica: Barbie Girl
  • Submissives Who Work
    Submissives Who Work
  • The Anthropology of Female Submissives
    The Anthropology of Female Submissives

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Email

Tagged With: bdsm, bdsm relationship, dominant, fetish, kink, power exchange, submissive

Like Kink Weekly? Support us on Patreon!

Become a Patron!

Help keep us online & get epic good karma (and no ads)
Already a supporter? We love you! Visit here to enable ad-free browsing.

Sale – today only

Premium lockable ankle cuffs

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mistressmoon says

    February 9, 2021 at 8:35 am

    All dominants and submissives should read this! Great stuff!

    Reply
  2. Mira O'Hart says

    February 8, 2021 at 4:18 pm

    Lovely article. I fully agree with the premise, that when we strive to meet an impossible ideal, it ruins things. One thought I had was that, as a dominant who wants their submissive to express desire and attraction, could we not teach and reward this behavior like any other we want to encourage? We all want to feel wanted. Maybe that looks a little different for each of us, but the core is the same. Maybe some of the issue stems from the submissive feeling that if they express a want for affection that they are not being ‘submissive’ enough? Maybe establishing a certain ritual or preferred method for them seeking affection/intimacy might work for both parties. Again, lovely article that touches on an important relationship aspect we all face.

    Reply
    • Rika says

      February 10, 2021 at 9:30 am

      “Reward” is probably the wrong word.

      Clearly define what you want, present it to your submissive an assure that they understand it, then expect it from them. Accept no less. If they’re having trouble delivering (in your assessment), explain your assessment, seek out why the sub is having difficulty, and help and enable the sub to improve. Continue to monitor, feedback, and improve.

      No need for “rewards”. In fact, rewards provide a motivation that’s different than the motivation of serving (which is that of the dominant’s satisfaction and pleasure in the service), and therefore, actually work AGAINST establishing effective submission.

      Remember, we’re not trying to compel behavior, we’re trying to adjust INTENT — and then allow intent to drive behavior. It’s not what a sub does that’s important, it’s WHY they do it, that defines the quality of the submission.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Don’t miss out!

Get an email each week when new editions are online
We won't spam you, and you can
easily unsubscribe at any time

Sale – today only

Bondage kinks coffee mug

Put a smile on your face each morning

Support Kink Weekly on Patreon!

Become a Patron!

Help keep us online and get
epic good karma (and no ads)

Already a supporter? We love you! Visit here to enable ad-free browsing.

Get

Premium lockable ankle cuffs

Contribute

Want to feature your writing or photography on Kink Weekly? Are you an BDSM/sex expert or professional, and interested in being quoted in an article? Contact us

Archives

sexy blonde Domme with male submissive in straitjacket

Simple Mummification Fun!

By PirateStan Leave a Comment

Learn helpful mummification techniques in this week’s edition!

shibari male submissive bound

Why Excellent Submission Can Be Remarkably Illusive

By Ms. RikaLeave a Comment

Dive deep into submission with Ms. Rika in this week’s edition!

Footer

18 U.S.C. 2257 record keeping compliance statement
Always play
Safe Sane and Consensual

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in